Family, please stop being misled by the deus ex machina that is the Changeling. He and his cohorts would have you believe that theirs are the mighty shoulders upon which we stand -- they are not, but hers are:
Assata Shakur in Her Own Words: Rare Recording of Activist Named to FBI Most Wanted Terrorists List
Angela Davis and Assata Shakur’s Lawyer Denounce FBI’s Adding of Exiled Activist to Terrorists List
Designated a domestic terrorist? 40 years later? What the hell is this, some kind of dog whistle to distract from the very white faces of the FBI/CIA-followed (if not handled), Tsarnaev brothers?
Family, our culture doesn't stand a chance in these alleged United States if we don't stop living this life with our eyes wide shut. We must all begin to think critically, act purposefully -- and become our OWN "agents of change!"
Related:
- An Open Letter to President Obama on the Matter of Assata Shakur
- Assata Shakur Is Not a Terrorist
- Gregory Kane: The rest of the Chesimard story
- Why the Hunt for Assata Shakur Matters
Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Thursday, February 25, 2010
At last - VINDICATION! - Danziger 7's finally going to jail
When I volunteered in New Orleans with Habitat for Humanity in 2006, I got to sit and talk with a lot of Black New Orleanians who said the shooting on the Danziger Bridge had nothing to do with self-defense. Their take? The crooked NOPD was "protecting" the people on the predominantly white, other side of the bridge, scared that the poor and predominantly Black folk were coming to take their shit.
I saved this excellent Matt Taibbi piece among the many I continue to save regarding NOLA, because it was real-time descriptive. And as I re-read my links for this post, I realized he'd referenced, what I think, was the shooting on the Danziger Bridge:
My Grandmama always said, "Whatever you do in the dark, WILL come to light." I can't tell you how many times that one little sentence has kept me going. Today is certainly one of them (She ALSO said, "A guilty conscience needs no accusin'" - but I'm still a little shaky on that one always coming true - despite today's developments.)
Here are a few interesting post-Katrina videos regarding the Danziger Bridge shootings:
Posted January 1, 2007:
This video posted January 3, 2007:
CNN's Sean Callebs exclaimed in the intro:
Oh! And that statement from attorney, Frank DeSalvo about publicity pimp extraordinaire, the Right Rev. Al Sharpton?
Posted December 5, 2007
This piece by Laura Maggi of The Times-Picayune ran on August 13, 2008: Charges rejected against Danziger 7. The last paragraph is particularly interesting given todays developments:
And sorry Obots, no props to the Changeling or Holder on this one. However if it turns out they deserve the props, you can bet - in the interest of honesty and fair play - I will give it. But according to this August 11, 2009 piece - FBI Investigates New Orleans Police For Katrina Killings - the FBI investigation began before they even took their seats:
Now what I will say is - there is a possibility that the "fear" of what a society-identified Black, Obama Administration might do (or find) could have hastened the FBI's decision. But so what? Until you give me some concrete, Holder-fingerprinted evidence that it was he, who actually caused this investigation to go forth - keep holding your beath.
Instead, I prefer to attribute today's developments to what REAL journalism can do. Hat's off - and my own lowly Pulitzer Prize nomination for Investigative Reporting (if I had one) goes to:
The New Orleans Times-Picayune reporters, Laura Maggi and Brendan McCarthy along with their City Editor, Gordon Russell along with ProPublica , reporter A.C. Thompson and Frontline Producer, Tom Jennings.
Sean Callebs and CNN are you paying attention?
I saved this excellent Matt Taibbi piece among the many I continue to save regarding NOLA, because it was real-time descriptive. And as I re-read my links for this post, I realized he'd referenced, what I think, was the shooting on the Danziger Bridge:
The very moment we'd arrived, news chimed in over the police radios that cops had shot and killed five looters at a bridge somewhere outside town. The news was met with a high cheer ("That's right, motherfuckers!" was one cry), and the whole crowd was buzzed, like a bar after midnight.Of course, back then - and until today, everybody and their Mama kept saying they were wrong. Then, lo and behold! We hear this: Former police officer pleads guilty to Danziger Bridge shooting cover-up of stunning breadth.
My Grandmama always said, "Whatever you do in the dark, WILL come to light." I can't tell you how many times that one little sentence has kept me going. Today is certainly one of them (She ALSO said, "A guilty conscience needs no accusin'" - but I'm still a little shaky on that one always coming true - despite today's developments.)
Here are a few interesting post-Katrina videos regarding the Danziger Bridge shootings:
Posted January 1, 2007:
This video posted January 3, 2007:
CNN's Sean Callebs exclaimed in the intro:
"But the WAY they turned themselves in really speaks volumes about the way the case is playing out here in New Orleans." (emphasis his)It sure does speak volumes, Sean - but not in the way you implied. The December 5th video below provides a decidedly non-white and rather clear-eyed view of what all that cheering was really about. And wonder of wonders! It, and the truths it contains, were out there at least a month before your - "report." Truth be told, those "truths" were out there much longer - but nobody listened. Guess it never occurred to you there was a REASON you couldn't get a comment from an NOPD officer huh, Sean? But I gotta give it to you, Officer Billy Mims (from that other uh-uh unit) spouting the Blue Line meme was a pretty good foil though.
"As the seven people made their way to the sheriff's office, they were greeted by cheers, applause and chants of NOPD."
Oh! And that statement from attorney, Frank DeSalvo about publicity pimp extraordinaire, the Right Rev. Al Sharpton?
"Four of the officers were Black, Rev. Sharpton either can't count or he can't see."I'll just repeat what I said in my last post on Tiger Woods - "White Americans, and those,"I've-arrived-cuz-I-think-like-them" others - REALLY need to get a grip. Just because you're Black doesn't mean you do not participate in the White Supremacist Capitalist Patriarchy (DeSalvo, listen to some bell hooks why don't you??). The reverend, also a card-carrying member, was dead-right on this one. I just think he let go of it because he felt he couldn't get enough media play with that little "four-Black-officers-wrinkle" - not without exposing his WSCP membership, that is.
Posted December 5, 2007
This piece by Laura Maggi of The Times-Picayune ran on August 13, 2008: Charges rejected against Danziger 7. The last paragraph is particularly interesting given todays developments:
Madison said U.S. Attorney Jim Letten has said his office doesn't want to take up the case. Letten on Wednesday said his staff continues to monitor the case, along with the Justice Department's civil rights division, but had declined to step into a matter being handled by the Orleans Parish district attorney's office. (emphasis mine)ProPublica has had an ongoing and exhaustive series of investigative reports about police misconduct in New Orleans post-Katrina. To get an understanding of why the Feds were finally forced to investigate, please peruse - "Law & Disorder" After Katrina, New Orleans Police Shot Frequently and Asked Few Questions, paying particular attention to the case in the news today - Case Six: Danziger Bridge.
And sorry Obots, no props to the Changeling or Holder on this one. However if it turns out they deserve the props, you can bet - in the interest of honesty and fair play - I will give it. But according to this August 11, 2009 piece - FBI Investigates New Orleans Police For Katrina Killings - the FBI investigation began before they even took their seats:
Last September, federal officials announced plans to investigate the officers involved in the Sept. 4, 2005, shootings on the Danziger Bridge that killed two men and injured four. A state court judge has thrown out murder and attempted murder charges against seven current and former officers, but the FBI is investigating if civil rights were violated. (emphasis mine)If my calculations are correct, that'd put the opening of the investigation somewhere around September of 2008.
Now what I will say is - there is a possibility that the "fear" of what a society-identified Black, Obama Administration might do (or find) could have hastened the FBI's decision. But so what? Until you give me some concrete, Holder-fingerprinted evidence that it was he, who actually caused this investigation to go forth - keep holding your beath.
Instead, I prefer to attribute today's developments to what REAL journalism can do. Hat's off - and my own lowly Pulitzer Prize nomination for Investigative Reporting (if I had one) goes to:
The New Orleans Times-Picayune reporters, Laura Maggi and Brendan McCarthy along with their City Editor, Gordon Russell along with ProPublica , reporter A.C. Thompson and Frontline Producer, Tom Jennings.
Sean Callebs and CNN are you paying attention?
Monday, April 28, 2008
Liberty City 6 - will the third time be a charm?
Last Wednesday here in South Florida, Asst. U.S. Attorney Richard Gregorie made clear his plan to try the Liberty City 7, er 6 yet again. They were seven, but the jury in the first trial acquitted one of them (here are the recent details with links to all of the background "news you can use" articles beginning in July of 2007 when the government first "uncovered" this terrorist plot: 'Liberty City 6' To Be Tried For Third Time).
Like those oh, so elusive WMDs that precipitated our occupation of Iraq, draining both our human and monetary capital, this farce is yet another exercise in fear-mongering. Somebody tell me how these damn-near homeless, assuredly greedy yet undeniably gullible Black men, could perpetrate this massive act of terrorism in America with no guns, no explosives, no knowledge of making said explosives, no apparent prior connection to Al Qaeda and most importantly - no damn money???
But for Mr. Batiste saying on tape he wanted to "kill all the American devils" coupled with the urging of the FBI informant who offered these men $50,000, hiking boots and a camera (he bought them a camera to take surveillance photos of buildings that al Qaeda wanted blown up) if they would pledge allegiance to Al Qaeda, no one, I repeat NO ONE, would give two shits about the likes of Narseal Batiste, Patrick Abraham, Stanley Grant Phanor, Naudimar Herrera, Burson Agustin and Rotschild Augustine and Lyglenson Lemorin, the seventh of the group who was found not guilty in the first trial. Hell, Louis Farrakhan's been talking about "American devils" since his rise to power in the Nation of Islam and nobody's ever charged him with terror conspiracy. And I certainly need not go into the Church Committee's final report on the FBI's COINTELPRO shenanigans to point out why all this prosecution is so much entrapment bullshit.
Two juries to date have said the government has no evidence to show that these men were ever a real terrorism threat - TWO! Yet the government, after having spent somewhere in the neighborhood of $5 - $8 million taxpayer dollars, plans to go ahead and spend a minimum of $1 mllion more - with the same evidence used in the prior two trials! I guess the prosecutor's decided if he tries this case over and over and over again, it will make it so.
UPDATE: The third trial's been set for January 6, 2009. See CNN's "Wannabes or terrorists? Third jury may decide"
Like those oh, so elusive WMDs that precipitated our occupation of Iraq, draining both our human and monetary capital, this farce is yet another exercise in fear-mongering. Somebody tell me how these damn-near homeless, assuredly greedy yet undeniably gullible Black men, could perpetrate this massive act of terrorism in America with no guns, no explosives, no knowledge of making said explosives, no apparent prior connection to Al Qaeda and most importantly - no damn money???
But for Mr. Batiste saying on tape he wanted to "kill all the American devils" coupled with the urging of the FBI informant who offered these men $50,000, hiking boots and a camera (he bought them a camera to take surveillance photos of buildings that al Qaeda wanted blown up) if they would pledge allegiance to Al Qaeda, no one, I repeat NO ONE, would give two shits about the likes of Narseal Batiste, Patrick Abraham, Stanley Grant Phanor, Naudimar Herrera, Burson Agustin and Rotschild Augustine and Lyglenson Lemorin, the seventh of the group who was found not guilty in the first trial. Hell, Louis Farrakhan's been talking about "American devils" since his rise to power in the Nation of Islam and nobody's ever charged him with terror conspiracy. And I certainly need not go into the Church Committee's final report on the FBI's COINTELPRO shenanigans to point out why all this prosecution is so much entrapment bullshit.
Two juries to date have said the government has no evidence to show that these men were ever a real terrorism threat - TWO! Yet the government, after having spent somewhere in the neighborhood of $5 - $8 million taxpayer dollars, plans to go ahead and spend a minimum of $1 mllion more - with the same evidence used in the prior two trials! I guess the prosecutor's decided if he tries this case over and over and over again, it will make it so.
UPDATE: The third trial's been set for January 6, 2009. See CNN's "Wannabes or terrorists? Third jury may decide"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)